You are currently viewing #20. CF 417/2013  Two Years in Jail for 3.8 tonne Ivory Case
R vs Fredrick Sababu Mungule and James Kassiwa in Mombasa Court on March 30th, 2022 for sentencing, having been found guilty of an offence under the East African Community Customs Management Act while attempting to export 638 pieces of ivory weighing 3827 kg to Thailand in January 2013.

#20. CF 417/2013 Two Years in Jail for 3.8 tonne Ivory Case

#20. CF 417/2013 Mombasa: Republic versus Fredrick Sababu and James Kassiwa

It was an atypical day in Mombasa Courtroom One on Wednesday afternoon, March 23rd, 2022. The court was sitting to render a verdict on a nine year old ivory trafficking case with the presiding Magistrate at the Nakuru Law Courts, 650 kilometres distant.  She had been transferred to Nakuru from Mombasa some months previous with this judgement still outstanding.  The two accused, their defence lawyers, a prosecutor, and members of the public were seated in the Mombasa Courtroom, one laptop and exterior speakers positioned for all to hear and maybe watch, some of the virtual session.

Fredrick Sababu Mungule and James Ngala Kassiwa had been charged with two offences under the East African Community Customs Management Act (EACCMA); conspiracy to contravene provisions of the said Act and bringing into customs area prohibited goods (also under the EACMMA), namely 638 pieces of ivory weighing 3827 kg for export to Thailand in January 2013.

Six weeks previous and in another Mombasa courtroom down the corridor, before another magistrate, both accused had been acquitted on other ivory charges under the EACCM, stemming from an 1833 kg seizure made in Singapore nine days after the one for which they were presently in court.

On those charges, it had been ruled that the prosecution had not presented the court with the evidence required to prove a prima facie case, meaning they had not passed the threshold of introducing enough evidence to prove the basic elements of the charge.  On this backdrop, it appeared that another acquittal was nigh.

That all changed, however, when Chief Magistrate Nyaloti asked prosecutor Kituma if the court orderlies were present within the court.  That question meant only one thing; Fredrick Sababu Mungule and James Kassiwa were going to jail. 

While CM Nyaloti did not read out the entire written judgement as is often protocol, it was clear that in her opinion, the investigation and prosecution had connected the container with both of the accused; Sababu with the purchase of the container through the East African Commercial and Shipping Company of Mombasa and the Kassiwa with deliberately allowing the container to pass into the port when presented with false documentation. The entry document had been previously used on November 26th, 2012 for a shipment of broken glass.

Sababu and Kassiwa have just been sentenced to two years jail

The presiding magistrate found the two guilty of the first charge of ‘conspiracy to contravene provisions of the EACMMA’ but not guilty of the second charge of ‘bringing into a customs area prohibited goods’.  

The two accused were clearly shocked on this afternoon and even more so the following Monday when, after hearing their lawyers arguments on mitigation, were sentenced to two years in jail.  While two years incarceration is better than the five years maximum permitted by statute, the body language of the accused indicated that were expecting something less.

To recap, on January 3rd, 2013, Hong Kong Customs announced that they had seized a sea container with 779 pieces of ivory weighing 1330 kg hidden amongst a cargo of mazeras stones.  The shipment had originated from Mombasa. 

In response, the Kenyan authorities put together an investigative task force comprised of members of the Directorate of Criminal Investigation (DCI), the Kenya Wildlife Service (KWS), the Kenya Revenue Agency (KRA), the Kenya Port Authority (KPA) and the Lusaka Agreement Task Force (LATF).  

On January 13th, it was discovered by a KPA clerk in Mombasa that there was another container within the port loading area that had logistical matches to the one seized in Hong Kong.  Further investigation led to the discovery of the container for which the accused have been charged in this case.

A third container, again with logistical matches to the previous two, landed in Singapore within days of the Mombasa discovery and was  verified to contain ivory. This time, 1099 pieces and weighing 1833 kg.

James Ngala Kassiwa (KRA)  and Gideon Naftali Osinyo Nyangau (KPA)  found themselves in Mombasa Court on January 23rd and charged in relation to the first Hong Kong seizure and the second Mombasa seizure.  Kassiwa was alleged to have permitted the trucks ferrying the ivory into the port while Nyangau “fixed” the paperwork to enable the loading of a container onto the ship. Fredrick Sababu Mungule, a ‘clearing agent’, was arraigned two weeks later on February 6th. 

It was not until the following October 1st, that Sababu Mungule, Kassiwa  and Nyangau were arraigned for the third Singapore ivory seizure, prosecutors perhaps waiting for the confirmed repatriation of the 1833 kg of ivory from Singapore that had arrived in Mombasa in August. (Gideon Nyangau reportedly died from an illness in January 2014.)

Two tusks from the Mombasa shipment were genetic matches to two tusks in a seizure that originated in Kampala but was seized in Dubai two months later. A genetic match is where two tusks from one elephant get separated prior to containerization and end up in different shipments.
Wrapped ivory and mazeras stones from the Singapore seizure

These three shipments, clearly the work of the same organization, totalled 6990 kg of ivory and comprised of 2516 tusks and tusk pieces. The three containers were delivered to the port by two vehicles controlled by the same person.  These same vehicles delivered 3 containers of ivory to Mombasa Port in 2015 and are the subject of a separate prosecution against Abdulrahman Mahmoud Sheikh and eight others.

All shipments had a cover load of mazeras stones. All shipments utilised similar false documentation.  All shipments were arranged through East African Commercial and Shipping Company of Mombasa, and all shipments were cleared by quasi forwarding agent, Fredrick Sababu Mungule, through his business, Mwamba Freight Services. This ‘cover’ business name had not been registered with KRA.  Sababu Mungule had been previously associated with a March 30th, 2011, 2033 kg shipment of ivory that was seized in Bangkok, Thailand and originated in Mombasa.

From a DNA analysis perspective, while the ivory from the Hong Kong shipment originated solely from savannah elephants in Mozambique, the Mombasa seizure originated from savannah elephants of Tanzania and Kenya.  

Two tusks from the Mombasa shipment were genetic matches to two tusks in a seizure that originated in Kampala but was seized in Dubai two months later.  A genetic match is when the two tusks from one elephant get separated prior to containerization and end up in different shipments. This Dubai seizure had three genetic matches to a 2898 kg ivory seizure made in Mombasa in October 2013.  This October seizure in turn had genetic matches with three other ivory seizures, one being a key 6043 kg December 2012 Malaysian seizure, where  a single container was found with significant quantities of savannah and forest elephant ivory and transited Togo in West Africa from its origin in Mombasa.   Certainly, the three January 2013 seizures under prosecution in Mombasa were part of a much bigger picture.

Regardless, it was decided that prosecutions relating to these seizures would be fragmented. The Hong Kong and Mombasa shipments were ‘consolidated’ into one prosecution, although the Hong Kong charges never made it to the new charge sheet rendering it essentially null and void.

The Singapore shipment became a second, separate prosecution. From the states perspective, the two prosecutions had two different lead investigators, two different prosecutors, were heard by two different Magistrates in two different courtrooms but with many similar witnesses and similar facts. In all likelihood, there will be two different appeals. 

When Sababu, Kassiwa and third accused Ayoo, were acquitted due to critical prosecutorial failings in the Singapore seizure on February 11th this year, it became yet another major ivory case that had not been successfully investigated/prosecuted in Kenya. Since 2009, there had only been one major ivory trafficking case that had registered an initial conviction; the blatantly corrupted investigation of Feisal Mohamed Ali, whose guilty verdict was overturned on appeal in 2018. 

This conviction under CM Nyaloti, should it stand the course of appeal, will become the first solid conviction in a major ivory case in Kenya. But is this cause for celebration or embarrassment?

A two year jail sentence after a nine year trial, handed down to two small cogs of a much larger ivory cartel is hardly something about which to brag.  Indeed, while there is no indication of a subverted verdict in this case, a prosecution that took nine years to complete, regardless of Covid 19, is no beacon of prosecutorial prowess, and more often than not, an indicator of subversion in play. In addition, lawyers for the Kenyan NGO, Wildlife Direct, had received death threats in 2017/2018 while covering this trial and the Singapore seizure prosecution making it clear that the involved cartel was concerned that their plan to subvert the trial process would be identified and called out.

At time of writing, the news on the finding of guilt against Fredrick Sababu Mungule and James Kassiwa for their part in attempting to export 3827 kg of ivory out of Mombasa, a shipment that was linked to a minimum of a dozen other multi-tonne ivory seizures in Kenya and abroad, has not made the Kenyan online news services. Two reporters from main stream media outlets were in attendance at Mombasa Court when the judgement was passed.

Perhaps therein lies the answer.

**It has since been learned that there will be no appeal in this case as the penalty was low and could easily be increased through the process.

 

Leave a Reply