Seej AfricaSeej Africa
  • Home
  • Our Story
    • About Us
    • History
    • Mission & Values
  • Wildlife Cases in The Courts
    • Active Case Index
    • Terms and Abbreviations
    • Concluded Case Index
    • 2023
    • 2022
    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • Pre 2013
  • Major Wildlife Seizures
  • West African Crime Group
  • News
    • Kenya
    • Africa
    • International
  • Commentary
  • Contact us
Reading: E522/23 Kilifi – R. vs. Samuel Kazungu Duka and Nelson Kiringi Nzai 5 kg ivory – CONVICTION
Share
Font ResizerAa
Font ResizerAa
Seej AfricaSeej Africa
  • Home
  • Our Story
  • Wildlife Cases in The Courts
  • Major Wildlife Seizures
  • West African Crime Group
  • News
  • Commentary
  • Contact us
  • Home
  • Our Story
    • About Us
    • History
    • Mission & Values
  • Wildlife Cases in The Courts
    • Active Case Index
    • Terms and Abbreviations
    • Concluded Case Index
    • 2023
    • 2022
    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • Pre 2013
  • Major Wildlife Seizures
  • West African Crime Group
  • News
    • Kenya
    • Africa
    • International
  • Commentary
  • Contact us
Have an existing account? Sign In
© Seej Africa. All Rights Reserved.
Seej Africa > Blog > 2023 > E522/23 Kilifi – R. vs. Samuel Kazungu Duka and Nelson Kiringi Nzai 5 kg ivory – CONVICTION
2023ConcludedWildlife Court Cases

E522/23 Kilifi – R. vs. Samuel Kazungu Duka and Nelson Kiringi Nzai 5 kg ivory – CONVICTION

SEEJ-AFRICA
Last updated: February 19, 2026 1:49 pm
SEEJ-AFRICA Published September 15, 2023
Share

Final Court Update

 
#17. January 15th, 2026 (Judgement): On this date, Chief Magistrate James N. Mwaniki, found the two accused guilty of possession of wildlife trophies and sentenced them to pay a 1 million shilling fine or in default, serve 2 1/2 years in prison. The accused had not been in remand custody.  The trial consisted of 17 sittings and lasted 29 months. 
 
The sentence of 2 1/2 years is below the 5 year minimum as set out in the WCMA.  
 
The media report on the conviction can be read here.

Overview

On September 12th, 2023, at approximately 12:30 hrs, while acting on intelligence, KWS in the Chumani area of Kilifi county, located the two accused carrying a yellow sack that contained 1 piece of ivory weighing 5 kg.

Sentencing Date:                     2026-01-15
Offence Date:                            2023-09-12
Magistrate(s):                         
Chief Magistrate James N. Mwaniki
Senior Principal Magistrate C. K. Kituku
Court:                                         Kilifi
Trial Duration:                             29 months – 17 sittings
Link:
Arrest Details:    Based on intelligence, KWS set up an ambush in the area of Chumani Primary school and observed 2 men carrying ‘luggage’ and who were arrested.
Sentence/Conclusion:             Convicted
Samuel Kazungu Duka: Sentenced to 1 million shilling fine i/d 2 1/2 years
Nelson Kiringi Nzai:   Sentenced to 1 million shilling fine i/d 2 1/2 years
Presiding Magistrate and Court:
 
Hon. James N. Mwaniki – Chief Magistrate
Hon. J. Kituku – Senior Principal Magistrate
 
State Counsel: 
Winnie Atieno
Accused Advocate: 
No advocate
Accused:                                                         
Samuel Kazungu Duka
Nelson Kiringi Nzai
Charges: 
  1. Dealing in wildlife trophy contrary to section 92 (2) WCMA 2013
  2. Being in possession of wildlife trophy of endangered species contrary to Section 92(4) WCMA
 
Date of Arrest:
2023-09-12
Date of Arraignment:
2023-09-13
Location of Arrest:
Chumani area of Kilifi county.
Contraband Seized: 
5 kg (1 pcs)

PROCEEDINGS

 
#8. June 6th, 2024 (Hearing): The scheduled hearing did not proceed and the hearing was adjourned to September 23rd, 2024.
 
 
*************************
 
#7. April 4th, 2024 (Hearing): The scheduled hearing did not proceed as the court was not sitting.  The matter was adjourned to June 6th for hearing.
 
*************************
 
#6. January 18th, 2023 (Hearing):  The matter was scheduled for hearing and the prosecution was ready to proceed with two witnesses. The two accused were also ready to proceed with the hearing. They had no legal representation.
 
Testimony of KWS witness:

PW1: I work with Kenya Wildlife Service in Mombasa as a ranger with over twenty years experience. I am also trained and authorized to take photographs for the institution.

On 12th September, 2023, at around 8:00 a.m, I was at the office at the KWS Headquarters in Mombasa going about my daily duties when I received an intelligence call that in Chuma village, Kilifi County, there were two male suspects in the possession of ivory and were looking for potential buyers with the intention to sell.

I called my colleagues officers and briefed them on the intelligence I had received.

We discussed on the way forward and at 10:00 a.m in an unmarked service vehicle to Kilifi County. We arrived at Chuma village at 11:30 a.m and parked our vehicle in a hidden area and waited. I crossed the road to Chuma Primary and around 12:30 p.m I saw two suspects that had been described to me. One was dressed in blue jeans and a red t-shirt and the other was dressed in a khaki trouser and a red t-shirt. They were both carrying a luggage in a sack.

I approached them together with my three colleagues and introduced ourselves. I then asked to inspect their luggage that they were carrying to which they agreed. In the sack we found a suspected ivory tusk that was carried in a yellow sack.

Prosecution: Would you like to have the yellow sack and the suspected ivory marked as MFI1 and MFI2 produced as exhibits 1 and 2 respectively?

PW1: Yes.

I then proceeded to enquire whether they had any permit from KWS allowing them to be in possession of the ivory to which they responded they did not. We then boarded our unmarked vehicle and proceeded to Kilifi Police Station.

At the station I took photographs of the sack and suspected ivory. I also prepared a report and certificate of photograph both dated 15th September, 2023.

Prosecution: Would you like to produce the report as Exhibit 3, certificate of photography as Exhibit 4 and the four photographs a s Exhibit 5?

PW1: Yes.

At the station, my colleague, weighed the trophy at 5 kilograms and he also prepared weighing certificate which the arresting team signed on 12th September, 2023. However, the two suspects refused to sign.

I prepared an inventory dated 12th September, 2023 which the arresting team signed but yet again, the two suspects refused to sign.

Prosecution: Your Honour, the inventory is marked as MFI7.

PW1: The suspects were booked at Kilifi Police Station.

We then proceeded to KWS headquarters in Mombasa with the exhibits and stored them in the armoury. I am informed that the IO took the exhibits and exhibit memo to the National Museum in Nairobi for analysis.

The two suspects we arrested are in court today and we identified them at the time of arrest through their National Identity Cards that were in their possession.

Cross-examination by the 1st Accused

A1: At the time of the arrest why did you ambush four people in a motor vehicle but only arrested the two of us and released the other two?

PW1: There were only two of you at the scene where we arrested you.

A1: You arrested four of us in a vehicle but when we got to the police station, only the two of us were booked.

PW1: That is not true, you were two of you and we arrested you while you were walking.

Cross-examination by the 2nd Accused

A2: Why are you lying that you arrested us while we were walking yet were four of us in a motor vehicle but you only arrested the two of us?

PW1: I’m not lying. You were walking and not in a motor vehicle.

Re-examination by the Prosecution:

Prosecution: How many people did you arrest?

PW1: two

Prosecution: Did the description of the suspects by the intelligence match the suspects arrested?

PW1: Yes

Prosecution: Did you arrest them while they were walking or in a motor vehicle.

PW1: While they were walking.

Prosecution: How were they carrying the luggage at the time of the ambush?

PW1: In a yellow sack each of them holding on either end,

Testimony of KWS witness #2:

PW2:  I work as a ranger at the KWS headquarters in Mombasa. On 12th September, 2023, I was called by the previous witness, PW#1, to his office at around 8:00 a.m.

I got to the office and we were briefed together with my colleagues, on an intelligence call that had just been received on two suspects in Kilifi County that were in the possession of suspected ivory and were looking for a potential buyer.

At around 10:00 a.m we left Mombasa and headed to Chuma village in Kilifi County. We arrived at Chuma village at 11:30 a.m and parked our vehicle in a hidden area and waited.  PW#1 crossed the road to Chuma Primary and around 12:30 p.m we saw two suspects that had been described. One was dressed in blue jeans and a red t-shirt and the other was dressed in a khaki trouser. and a red t-shirt. They were both carrying luggage in a sack. We approached them and introduced ourselves. PW#1 then asked to inspect their luggage that they were carrying to which they agreed. In the sack we found a suspected ivory tusk that was carried in a yellow sack.

We asked them whether they had the permit to be in possession of the same to which they said they did not.

We arrested them and took them to Kilifi Police Station in our unmarked service vehicle. At the station I weighed the trophy and it was five kilograms. I prepared a weighing certificate and also the inventory. The arresting team signed all of them.

Prosecution: Do you wish to produce the weighing certificate as Exhibit 6 and the inventory as Exhibit 7?

PW2: Yes.

I wish to note that the suspects refused to sign the weighing certificate and the inventory.

The suspects were booked at the Kilifi Police station and we left for KWS headquarters in Mombasa with the exhibits for safe keeping at the KWS armoury and analysis at the National Museums of Kenya.

I can see the two suspects are in court today.

Cross-examination by first accused

A1: Do you know individuals by the name Samson Katan and Salim Mwaro who you arrested us with?

PW2: No, I do not know them, we did not arrest you with any other individuals. It was only the two of you.

A1: I do not have any other questions.

Cross-examination by second accused

A2: Why did you arrest four of us but only booked the two of us at the station?

PW2: You were only two when we arrested you and not four.

Re-examination by the prosecution

Prosecution: How many people did you arrest?

PW2: two

Prosecution: Which vehicle did you transport them in when you took them to Kilifi Police Station?

PW2: Our unmarked service vehicle

The prosecution noted that they had three more witnesses and prayed that the matter be adjourned.  The court gave a further hearing date of 4th April, 2024

*************************

#5. December 18th, 2023 (Hearing):  Today’s scheduled hearing did not take place. The regular court 1 prosecutor was unavailable. The court 2 prosecutor, Antony Khungu, advised the court that the court one prosecutor is better to handle the KWS cases as wildlife cases are complex capital cases and better handled by the same prosecutor. Two KWS witnesses were present with the ivory exhibit and agreed for another date to be taken. The two accused were also present. Chief Magistrate Nang’ea adjourned the matter for hearing on January 18th, 2024.

 
*************************
 
#4. October 26th, 2023 (Mention): Pre-trial completed, adjourned to Dec 18th. It was done in Magistrate’s chambers.  The prosecutor was present, as were the accused, who are out on bond and unrepresented.
 
*************************
 
#3. September 28th, 2023 (Pre-Trial Mention): The court was not sitting so pre-trial adjourned to October 26th.
 

*************************

#2. September 27th, 2023 (Bond approvals): Application accepted and both accused are no longer in custody.

*************************

#1. September 13th, 2023 (Plea):  Two ivory suspects have today been arraigned in court. The two were charged for dealing and  being in possession of ivory.  Both the accused denied the charges and were released  on a bond of KES 300,000 or cash bail of KES 250,000. Mention is slated for September 28, 2023, and hearing for December 18th, 2023

Saving Endangered Species through Education and Justice

You Might Also Like

Higher Court Dismisses Appealed Life Sentence for Prison Warder on 5 kg Ivory Conviction

JKIA Court Sends Six Ivory and Turtle Traffickers to Jail

Seven years jail for woman found with ivory and pangolin scales

Failed or ‘Failed’? Postmortem of an Ivory Prosecution – Part 4 Conclusion

Failed or ‘Failed’? Postmortem of an Ivory Prosecution – Part 3

TAGGED:Conviction
Share This Article
Facebook Twitter Email Copy Link Print
Previous Article E780/19 Kwale – R. vs. Augustine Oduor Malingo and Nancy Akoth Owino 1 kg ivory and hippo tooth – Conviction
Next Article E068/22 Kahawa – R. vs. John Nyabuto Mosago, Andrew Maina Maenda, Henry Nyabuto Ongaki, Peter Babu Onduso 26.5 kg Ivory
Popular News
Can an Elephant Tusk be Anything Else?
418/17 Shanzu – Charges Laid in 2013 One Tonne Singapore Ivory Seizure
Self-censorship, Truth, Corruption and Calling “BULLSHIT!”.

Popular Tags

2015 2017 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Acquittal Bushmeat Compromised Compromise Indicators Conviction Corruption Deportation DNA Analysed Escapee JKIA Kahawa Kenya Wildlife Task Force Linked Seizure No Prosecution Pangolin Police arrested Quashed Conviction Rhino Rosewood Sandalwood Sentencing The Sheikh's Voi Warrant West African Crime Group Linkage Withdrawn

OUR STORY

  • About
    About
  • History
    History
  • Mission & Values
    Mission & Values
  • Funding
    Funding

NEWS

  • Kenya
    Kenya
  • Africa
    Africa
  • International
    International

WILDLIFE COURT CASES

  • Active Case Index
    Active Case Index
  • Concluded Case Index
    Concluded Case Index
  • Terms & Abbreviations
    Terms & Abbreviations

CONTACT INFO

©2023 Seej Africa. All Rights Reserved.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?