Seej AfricaSeej Africa
  • Home
  • Our Story
    • About Us
    • History
    • Mission & Values
  • Wildlife Cases in The Courts
    • Active Case Index
    • Terms and Abbreviations
    • Concluded Case Index
    • 2023
    • 2022
    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • Pre 2013
  • Major Wildlife Seizures
  • West African Crime Group
  • News
    • Kenya
    • Africa
    • International
  • Commentary
  • Contact us
Reading: Nine Year Ivory Trafficking Case Ends in Acquittal of Three – Kenya
Share
Aa
Aa
Seej AfricaSeej Africa
  • Home
  • Our Story
  • Wildlife Cases in The Courts
  • Major Wildlife Seizures
  • West African Crime Group
  • News
  • Commentary
  • Contact us
  • Home
  • Our Story
    • About Us
    • History
    • Mission & Values
  • Wildlife Cases in The Courts
    • Active Case Index
    • Terms and Abbreviations
    • Concluded Case Index
    • 2023
    • 2022
    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • Pre 2013
  • Major Wildlife Seizures
  • West African Crime Group
  • News
    • Kenya
    • Africa
    • International
  • Commentary
  • Contact us
Have an existing account? Sign In
© Seej Africa. All Rights Reserved.
Seej Africa > Blog > 2013 > Nine Year Ivory Trafficking Case Ends in Acquittal of Three – Kenya
2013Wildlife Court CasesWildlife Crime Courtroom Watch

Nine Year Ivory Trafficking Case Ends in Acquittal of Three – Kenya

SEEJ-AFRICA
Last updated: 2023/07/31 at 5:38 PM
SEEJ-AFRICA Published February 11, 2022
Share
Fredrick Sababu Mungule, Nelson Ayoo and James Kassiwa were found not guilty in February 2022 for trafficking 1833 kg of ivory to Singapore from Mombasa. Chief Magistrate Francis Kyambia stated that the prosecution had not met the threshold of establishing a prima facie case. Several indicators of a compromised case were evidenced in this trial including threats to lawyers of Wildlife Direct and 'hostile' testimony from the investigating officer.

The three had been charged for their role in exporting 1833 kg of elephant tusks through Mombasa Port in December 2012.

In a March 2021 report, the Head of Kenya’s Directorate of Criminal Investigations (DCI), George Kinoti, admitted: “wildlife crime was not initially taken seriously as a major crime.” His counter part, Head of the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions, Noordin Haji, should be echoing the remarks.

On Friday, February 11th, 2022, Chief Magistrate Francis Kyambia, ruled in a Mombasa Court, “the prosecution has not met the threshold of establishing a prima facie case”, thereby acquitting the three accused. After eight years in court, the testimony and exhibits of 15 witnesses, and the repatriation of 1833 kg of ivory from Singapore to Kenya, the prosecution could not prove the essential elements of the two charges before the court.

The seizure from which the charges emanate occurred in Singapore in January 23rd, 2013.  Singapore officials, on a notification from the Kenya Revenue Authority, seized a 20’ container found concealing 1833 kg of ivory in eight of the 17 wooden crates  found within.  Galana stones (also known as mazera stones) were found to be the cover load and the container originated from Mombasa.

This seizure came barely one week after 3872 kg of ivory was intercepted at  Mombasa Port , and three weeks after 1300 kg of ivory was discovered in a sea container in Hong Kong having originated from Mombasa. All three shipments were allegedly from the same consignor, processed by the same clearing agent and all had a cover load of galana stones. 

Within days, DCI detectives arrested employees of the Kenya Port Authority and Kenya Revenue Authority relating to the Mombasa 3872 kg seizure. Gideon Naftali Onsinyo Nyangau and James Kassiwa were charged with ‘Bringing into a customs area prohibited goods namely 1099 pieces of ivory’ and ‘Comprising to bring’ the same, both offences under the East Africa Community Customs Management Act. 

The charge sheet was amended on February 7th with the addition of the clearing agent alleged to have processed the shipment, Fredrick Sababu Mungule.  Mungule was no stranger to the ivory game having been suspected of facilitating a 2033 kg shipment from Mombasa to Thailand in March 2011.  

In late August 2013, the ivory seized in Singapore was back on Kenyan soil. Five weeks later,  the same three accused; Mungule, Nyangau, Kassiwa, with the addition of KRA employee, Nelson Ayoo, were charged again for the Singapore 1833 kg shipment, the charge for which they have been acquitted.  It was alleged that Mungule had processed the shipment documentation, Kassiwa and Ayoo had permitted the container into the port and that Nyangau had manipulated paper work to permit the loading of the containers onto the required vessels.

While some ‘curious’ decision making took place in the early years of this prosecution, it was not until late 2017 that the true colours of the case were unfurled.  It was then that Kenyan NGO, Wildlife Direct, decided to put this prosecution under their microscope to monitor.  Shortly thereafter, their Legal Department manager was threatened on a busy Mombasa street by an armed man who made it clear of his and his family’s health would be impacted if he did not drop his interest in this case.  A few months later, his Nairobi residence was broken into by unknown suspects.

From that point forward, the outcome was clearly preordained. The question was only how circuitous the route. 

Before the trial came to a close, the prosecution called 15 witnesses. Two of the ‘witnesses’, Musa Jacob Lithare and David Ali, had been arrested for their involvement in transporting 3 containers of ivory into Mombasa Port in April and May 2015. It was subsequently found that they had also been involved in transporting ivory in the cases for which Mungule et al had been charged.

Initially, Lithare and Ali, were also charged with Mungule et al but that changed in 2016. The ODPP, on request from DCI, decided to make Lithare and Ali prosecution witnesses against Mungule et al. During their ensuing testimony in the two separate trials, however, they gave not one piece of evidence against any of the accused. 

Of the remaining 13 witnesses, none could provide any evidence that Mungule had anything to do with the container that was taken into port. In fact, testimony revealed that a male identified as Denis Maitha,  accompanied the container into port and paid the appropriate fees.  There was never an explanation by investigators as to the identified Maitha.

None of the 13 witnesses provided any evidence that Mungule knew Ayoo or Kassiwa (Nyangau had reportedly passed away in 2014) or that they had conspired in any manner. In fact, there was evidence indicating that Nelson Ayoo was not even working on the evening that the container was “gated in” to the port but that he had “unprocedurally authorised use of his lotus credentials” to Kassiwa with the knowledge of his direct supervisor.

Amongst witnesses that were not called?  Any one of three employees of the East Africa Commercial and Shipping Company who provided statements to the police indicating that Fred Sababu Mungule was a frequent customer of theirs, had communicated with them face to face, and received the bill of lading relating to the container of ivory that went to Singapore. 

The worst was yet to come, however, when on July 1st, 2021, the lead investigator, Sgt. Lemiso, took the stand.  This was the time when the prosecution had an opportunity to try and plug the significant leakage in their case.  Sgt. Lemiso concluded his testimony within 30 minutes, hardly the time to cover an investigation that spanned two continents and some years.  In the ensuing cross examination, Sgt. Lemiso, provided not one answer that indicated that he had anything but the briefest idea of what the investigation entailed. Most of his responses were one word: “no”.  And the last question from defence counsel: “Are you aware of anything relevant to this case?” Facetious but sadly appropriate.

At the time of this acquittal, the prosecution relating to the 3827 kg Mombasa seizure is waiting on the final judgement of Chief Magistrate Edna Nyaloti. On the positive side, that prosecution did pass the threshold of a ‘prima facie’ case.  On the negative side, “external factors” were present, yet again.

You Might Also Like

565/20 Kibera- R. Vs Jesse Mwangi Karanja, Ngugi Muigai, Catherine Kabura 3 kg

E212/23 Mariakani – R. vs. Ngari Charo Kahindi 4 kg Ivory

E111/22 Shanzu – R. vs. Changawa Kazungu Masha 6.2 kg + Hippo tooth

E737/20 Kajiado -R. vs. Dennis Maheli Alima and David Ajwala 81pcs of ivory and hippo tooth

E068/22 Kahawa – R. vs. John Nyabuto Mosago, Andrew Maina Maenda, Henry Nyabuto Ongaki, Peter Babu Onduso 26.5 kg Ivory

TAGGED: Acquittal, West African Crime Group Linkage
SEEJ-AFRICA July 31, 2023 February 11, 2022
Share this Article
Facebook Twitter Email Copy Link Print
Previous Article Another Nigeria Seizure Makes it almost 24,000 kilograms of Pangolin Scales in a Year
Next Article 754/13 Mombasa – R. vs Fredrick Sababu Mungule, James Kassiwa and Nelson Ayoo 1833 kg ivory
Popular News
Embu – Two arrested with 53 kg ivory
April 2009 – 703 kg of Ivory Seized From Vehicle Travelling From Tanzania
July 2009: Jomo Kenyatta IA – Kenya seizes coffin-stashed ivory

Popular Tags

2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Acquittal Bushmeat Compromised Compromise Indicators Conviction Corruption Deportation DNA Analysed JKIA Linked Seizure No Prosecution Pangolin Quashed Conviction Rhino Rosewood Sandalwood The Sheikh's West African Crime Group Linkage Withdrawn

OUR STORY

  • About
    About
  • History
    History
  • Mission & Values
    Mission & Values
  • Funding
    Funding

NEWS

  • Kenya
    Kenya
  • Africa
    Africa
  • International
    International

WILDLIFE COURT CASES

  • Active Case Index
    Active Case Index
  • Concluded Case Index
    Concluded Case Index
  • Terms & Abbreviations
    Terms & Abbreviations

CONTACT INFO

©2023 Seej Africa. All Rights Reserved.

Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?